By Cedric Boeckx
Read or Download Agreement Systems (Linguistik Aktuell Linguistics Today, Volume 92) PDF
Best linguistics books
Written by way of a world meeting of major philosophers, this quantity offers a survey of up to date philosophy of language. in addition to supplying a synoptic view of the main concerns, figures, ideas and debates, each one essay makes new and unique contributions to ongoing debate. subject matters coated comprise: rule following, modality, realism, indeterminacy of translation, inscrutability of reference, names and inflexible vacation spot, Davidson's software, which means and verification, goal and conference, radical interpretation, tacit wisdom, metaphor, causal theories of semantics, gadgets and standards of id, theories of fact, strength and pragmatics, essentialism, demonstratives, reference and necessity, identification, which means and privateness of language, vagueness and the sorites paradox, holisms, propositional attitudes, analyticity.
This can be the main complete account of Catalan phonology ever released. Catalan is a Romance language, occupying a place someplace among French, Spanish, and Italian. it's the first language of six and a part million humans within the northeastern Spain and of the peoples of Andorra, French Catalonia, the Balearic Islands, and a small area of Sardinia.
Геральдический словарь, в котором представлены изображения и названия 530 геральдических фигур на 6 языках: французском, английском, немецком, испанском, итальянском, голландском.
- Voice and Argument Structure in Baltic
- Patterns in Sound, Patterns in Mind: Phonological Regularities in Speech Production
- The Highly Selective Thesaurus for the Extraordinarily Literate
- Metaphor and the Historical Evolution of Conceptual Mapping
Additional resources for Agreement Systems (Linguistik Aktuell Linguistics Today, Volume 92)
Victori încearcă proi /PROi să cînte. g. Kempchinski 1986, Terzi 1992, Landau 2004). As in Alboiu (2004, in preparation), I adopt here an approach which views thetaroles as features that can be valued via Agree on a par with any other unvalued feature and propose a raising account of control, with neither PRO nor pro. As noted earlier, I take the absence of independent semantic tense in control subjunctives to be synonymous with the failure to value Case on the embedded subject D. , uT) in the subjunctive clause.
PhD dissertation, UCLA. Krapova, Y. 2001. Subjunctives in Bulgarian and modern Greek. In Comparative Syntax of Bal- Chapter 1. Are we in Agreement? kan Languages, M. L. Rivero and A. ), 105-127. Oxford: OUP. Landau, I. 1999. Elements of Control. PhD dissertation, MIT. Landau, I. 2003. Movement out of control. Linguistic Inquiry 34: 471-499. Landau, I. 2004. The scale of finiteness and the calculus of control. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 22: 811-877. Ledgeway, A. 1998. Variation in the Romance infinitive: The case of the southern Calabrian inflected infinitive.
Note that a Case-marked PRO has ceased to be a contradiction since Chomsky and Lasnik (1993); moreover, I take Landau’s point (2004) who argues against the concept of ‘null Case’ and suggests that PRO checks its Case feature and has it valued as any DP would in that domain - except that it will never be phonetically spelled out due to its anaphoric status. Unsurprisingly, its antecedent will be the one with the privilege of phonetic features. As indicated by the brackets around the subject DP in (32), for Persian, the antecedent need not be pronounced, which is expected given the pro-drop status of this language.